I (2012) CPJ 223 (NC)
Insurance — Suppression of Material Facts — Violation of terms and conditions of policy — Insured died — Claim repudiated — Insurance policy is contract entered between parties in utmost good faith and concealing of any information or giving incorrect information amounts to violation of terms and conditions — Repudiation justified.
I (2012) CPJ 200 (NC)
Jurisdiction — Remedy under Act, 1986 is in addition to and not in derogation of other remedies — Co-operative Society falls within expression of person as used under Act, 1986 and remedy under Act, 1986 is available to it because such remedy is not in derogation to provisions of Act, 1964.
I (2012) CPJ 194 (NC)
Education — Refund of Fee — Unfair Trade Practice — Although petitioners were not conventional educational institution but since, they are providing coaching and training to students of an educational nature, same principle that applies to educational institutions would also apply to these institutions in respect of fees — Refund of advance fees justified.
I (2012) CPJ 191 (NC)
Insurance — Insured equipments stolen — Breach of policy conditions — Information given in proposal form that premises where equipment was kept was not in use yet policy issued in favour of appellant — Respondent could not be allowed to take aid of exclusion clause of insurance policy by saying that keeping of equipment at uninhabited place for more than 7 days, without any security measure is violation of terms of policy — Matter remitted back.
I (2012) CPJ 178 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Enhancement of compensation — Joint liability — Responsibility of hospital to take care of patient — Patients go to hospital and not to particular doctor in hospital — Hospital was necessary party to proceedings before Consumer Commission — Liability of hospital and doctor was joint and several.
I (2012) CPJ 166 (NC)
Consumer — Explanation following Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Act would be clarificatory in nature and does not supplant meaning of word ‘consumer’, vis-a-vis, ‘services’ as it appears in main section where exclusion clause will come into play if it is for ‘commercial’ purpose.
I (2012) CPJ 166 (NC)
Investment — Improving ‘Livelihood Security’ of employees — Complainant/University invested funds of its employees with OP for their benefits — Investment made by University for improving ‘livelihood security’ of their employees who would be left with better ‘financial security’, after retirement — Therefore, investment shall not under any circumstances fall under word ‘commercial’ excluding complainant from definition of ‘consumer’ — Complaint maintainable.
I (2012) CPJ 160 (NC)
Seeds — Adulterated — Report of Technical Officer cannot be ignored merely because a sample of the seeds manufactured and distributed by respondents and used by petitioner was not subjected to full-scale laboratory test to determine the extent of adulteration — Reasonable compensation awarded.
I (2012) CPJ 158 (NC)
Electricity — Theft — Special Court — Charge of theft of electrical energy against the respondents could not be proved before Special Court — Order upheld.
I (2012) CPJ 156 (NC)
Restoration — Revision Petition — Undue weightage has been taken of accommodation shown by this Commission in believing words of various Advocates who have claimed to represent petitioner — This practice is unbecoming of diligent petitioner — Restoration not allowed.
I (2012) CPJ 150 (NC)
Insurance ( Life ) — Cancellation of group insurance policy — In cancelling policy, Insurance Company needed to write to “the insured” and not to “the insured person” — It was sufficient for Insurance Company to send notice only to ‘insured’, viz., the State Bank of India Officers Association — Repudiation justified.
I (2012) CPJ 148 (NC)
Telephones — Telecom Connections — Tariffs fixing — Not identical in all places — Rates of tariff applicable to connection could not be identical in all places in view of various techno-economic factors — No unfair trade practice.
I (2012) CPJ 138 (NC)
Insurance — Fire — Mother Board of Telecom Exchange and line control cards were damaged beyond repairs — Surveyor appointed — Proposal form does not show that additional premium was required to be paid for coverage of perils caused due to short-circuiting — Exclusion clause is not part of fire insurance policy itself — Such technical plea is raised with a view to avoid legal liability — Insurer liable to pay for loss.
I (2012) CPJ 129 (NC)
Revision — Powers of Commission are very limited and have to be exercised only if there is some prima facie jurisdictional error in impugned order.
I (2012) CPJ 128
Airlines — Cancellation of flight — No prior intimation — No alternate flight arranged — It was bounden duty of appellant to arrange confirmed tickets for complainants for their hassle free journey — Compensation granted.
I (2012) CPJ 125
Insurance ( Life ) — Death before acceptance of policy — Proposal of policy was accepted after death of proposer — In such condition, complainant not entitled to amount covered under policy as same was not in consonance with Rules.
I (2012) CPJ 122
Airlines — Inordinate delay in taking off flight — Suffering due to substandard food provided — Non-availability of wheel chair — Delayed operation of flights by appellant airlines was not due to reasons beyond their control — Such delay could have been avoided by appellant if due diligence was exercised — Deficiency proved.
I (2012) CPJ 116
Motor Vehicle — Three-wheeler for cartage of goods — Defects in engine — Contention, when goods are obtained for resale or for any commercial purpose, the person ceases to be consumer unless goods bought and used by him are for earning his livelihood by means of self-employment — Accepted — Complainant is not a consumer.
I (2012) CPJ 110 (NC)
Goods — Manufacturing defect — For any manufacturing defect in product, it is the manufacturer and not the dealer who could be held liable.
I (2012) CPJ 107 (NC)
Limitation — Condonation of Delay — Real purpose of Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 is to extend period of limitation prescribed by adding period during which suit or other proceeding has been prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith in a Court which either on account of defect of jurisdiction or other cause of like nature, was unable to entertain it — This section however, does not help a person who is guilty of negligence, laches or inaction — Reliefs claimed in writ petition and reliefs claimed in consumer complaint are different — Complainant cannot get benefit of Section 14 of Act seeking condonation of delay.
I (2012) CPJ 101 (NC)
Insurance — Transfer of certificate — Vehicle stolen — No privity of contract between complainant and petitioner — Complainant did not get novation of contract of insurance in person or property — He did not have insurable interest on date on which vehicle was stolen — Insurance Company cannot be held liable to pay claim in case of own damage of vehicle — Repudiation justified.
I (2012) CPJ 98
Insurance — Accident — Surveyor appointed — Driving licence validity — Insurance Company cannot be held liable to pay compensation on account of damages of tractor as same being driven by complainant in violation of terms and conditions of insurance policy.
I (2012) CPJ 92
Consumer Dispute — Pricing of flats cannot be a consumer dispute.
I (2012) CPJ 79
Jurisdiction — Builders —Entire dispute was of business to business and not consumer to business — Barred by jurisdiction.
I (2012) CPJ 63
Jurisdiction — Electricity — Provisions of Electricity Act barred jurisdiction of Civil Court or Consumer Forum.
I (2012) CPJ 55
Insurance — Assessment of loss —Illegal deductions — Deductions made by Surveyor for possibilities of variation in quantities, rate and to cover other contingencies found illegal — Repudiation unjustified.
I (2012) CPJ 49 (NC)
Shipping — Auction of Consignment — Delay in Release — Demurrage and Storage Charges — Complainants appear to have made request for waiver on last day for payment of demurrage and storage charges, only to make out case of deficiency against OP, which does not stand substantiated — However, under RBI regulations, storage charges could not be remitted from India to any port authority outside India — OPs were not legally entitled to recover storage charges and are willing to refund same, OP directed to refund same.
I (2012) CPJ 47 (NC)
Electricity — Excessive bill — Tampering — Slow Meter — Inspection report was drawn up by OP in presence of petitioner, which was also signed by him — This report specifically noted that meter seals had been tampered with and meter was running about 50% slow — Correct course for consumer with a dispute regarding correctness of electricity meter or of billed electricity consumption would be to apply to Electrical Inspector designated — Petitioner had not adopted said course.
I (2012) CPJ 43
Medical Negligence — Substandard Treatment — Serious negligence and lapses on part of OP in not referring child to higher burn centre soon after administration of initial treatment — As per statement of Plastic Surgeon, treatment provided to child in OP-2 hospital was not standard treatment — Deficiency proved.
I (2012) CPJ 41
Telegraph — Special remedy is provided in Telegraph Act for resolution of disputes in respect of telephone bills — Since, special remedy available under particular Act, remedy under Consumer Act is barred.
I (2012) CPJ 38
Banking and Financial Institutions Services — Wrong Debit Entry — No deficiency on part of OP proved as for failure of machine, which is beyond human control.
I (2012) CPJ 36 (NC)
Insurance ( Life ) — Revival of Policy — Accident happened on date of reviving policy — Repudiation — Policy revived by authorized officers of petitioner, on spot, at special camp on payment of requisite amount — Assured paid all subsequent premiums for relevant period — In such circumstance, Petitioner was not justified in repudiating claim after reviving the policy and accepting premiums for relevant period — No co-relation between accident and revival of policy — Repudiation unjustified.
I (2012) CPJ 34
Limitation — Administrative and procedural delay — Contention that there was administrative and procedural delay in filing appeal rejected — As per provisions, Consumer Forum is under duty to dismiss complaint filed beyond period of limitation if sufficient cause of delay was not shown — Administrative or procedural delay in processing case cannot be considered as sufficient cause for condonation of delay.
I (2012) CPJ 31
Insurance — Fire — Delayed Intimation — As per general condition of policy, it was duty of insured to intimate Insurance Company immediately within 24 hours or in any event, within 14 days of happening of any insured event giving rise to or likely to give rise to any claim under this policy and to give written notice to company — Delay of five months never be pardoned, particularly when Insurance Company had been deprived of getting matter investigated by some qualified Surveyor and Loss Assessor and to assess loss — Repudiation justified.
I (2012) CPJ 29
Courier — Non-delivery of Letter — There was privity of contract between complainant and appellant — Deficiency proved.
I (2012) CPJ 21 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Blood Transfusion — Infected Blood — Unauthorized Blood Bank — Blood for transfusion was purchased from respondent’s blood bank and disease was contracted during medically acknowledged period of incubation, confirms fact that it was because of contaminated blood that patient suffered Hepatitis B — Respondents were running unauthorized blood bank which casts adverse inference on safety standards observed in blood bank — Negligence proved.
I (2012) CPJ 20
Housing — Delayed Possession — Shortfall of Area — Substandard material — As per report of qualified Architect, deficiency of 145.34 sq. ft. in total builtup area proved — Lower quality of wood used — Deficiency in service established — Compensation granted.
I (2012) CPJ 19
Auction — Scheme to construct 42 shops — Respondent got layout changed and constructed 68 shops — Payment of proportionate amount to compensate shortage of accommodation provided by respondent.
I (2012) CPJ 19 (NC)
Insurance — Fire — Engine of lorry damaged due to fire — Repudiation of claim — If engine is taken out for carrying out some repairs then it does not cease to be part of motor vehicle i.e. lorry — It is too much on part of petitioner to contend that once a part is taken out it ceases to be covered under policy — Repudiation unjustified.
I (2012) CPJ 13 (NC)
Electricity — Connection — Dishonest abstraction — Already participated in availing process of adjudication of a dispute under a statute, a person cannot switch to alternative or additional remedy.
I (2012) CPJ 1
Jurisdiction — Commercial purpose — By no stretch of imagination, a private limited company could be treated as a person by which goods were bought and used or services were availed, exclusively for purposes of earning his/its livelihood by means of self-employment — Complaint not maintainable.
IV (2011) CPJ 111 (SC)
Accident— Assessment of Compensation — Victim suffers permanent disability, then efforts should always be made to award adequate compensation not only for physical injury and treatment, but also for loss of earning and his inability to lead a normal life and enjoy amenities, which he would have enjoyed.
IV (2011) CPJ 111 (SC)
Accident— “Compensation” — In case inAvolving total or partial disablement, compensation would include not only expenses incurred for immediate treatment, but also amount likely to be incurred for future medical treatment for a particular injury or disability caused by accident — Amount of compensation invariably includes pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.
IV (2011) CPJ 74 (SC)
R.V. Raveendran, J.— Uphaar Cinema Tragedy:
Punitive Damages — Illegal Acts — Licensee is liable to return and reimburse profits from illegally installed seats.
IV (2011) CPJ 74 (SC)
Negligence — Compensation — Public Law Remedy — Quantum — Awarding compensation to large group of persons, by way of public law remedy.
IV (2011) CPJ 74 (SC)
R.V. Raveendran, J.— Uphaar Cinema Tragedy:
Negligence — Contributory — Apportionment — Death of 59 persons due to asphyxiation by inhaling noxious fumes/smoke — Payment of Compensation — Liability of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and Licensing Authority — Liability shall be 85% on part of licensee and 15% on part of DVB.
IV (2011) CPJ 65 (SC)
Housing — Plot — Encroachment — Possession delivered to original allottee free from all encumbrances — Appellant not responsible — Orders set aside.
IV (2011) CPJ 684 (NC)
Insurance — Accident — Injury in spinal cord causing paralysis of her upper and lower limbs — Permanent disability — Claim repudiated — Benefit of 100% of the sum assured is available in case of “permanent total disablement” only — Disability certificate issued by Medical Board mentioned 50% disability — Complainant not entitled to get insurance amount.
IV (2011) CPJ 677 (NC)
Limitation — Failure to diagnose disease — Error of Judgment — Report of expert committee — No Negligence.
IV (2011) CPJ 669 (NC)
Auction — Consumer — Commercial plot — Possession not delivered — Deficiency in service in terms of failure of respondent to carry out assured development work is established.
IV (2011) CPJ 666 (NC)
Review — National Commission has power to review an order made by it or reconsider and recall ex parte order.
IV (2011) CPJ 650 (NC)
Securities — Shares — Sale and purchase — Notional and imposed loss — Consumer — Shares were sold by appellant without any instructions — Appeal dismissed.
IV (2011) CPJ 635 (NC)
Motor Vehicle — Certificate of sale — Manufacturing date disputed — Manufacturer not held liable — Compensation payable by dealer only.
IV (2011) CPJ 579 (NC)
Insurance — Theft — Recovered in bad condition — No insurable interest — Policy is not transferred in name of transferee — Company not liable to pay claim in own damage of vehicle — Repudiation justified.
IV (2011) CPJ 568 (NC)
Airlines— Cargo not delivered — Full payment made by purchaser — Complainant in financial liability — Compensation granted — No commercial purpose involved.
IV (2011) CPJ 557 (NC)
Insurance — Delay in lodging claim — Claim repudiated — Respondent had charged premium @ Rs. 100 from each of depositors, liability of Insurance Company would be Rs. 3 lacs to each of the account holders and not 50% in case of joint account holders.
IV (2011) CPJ 553 (NC)
Housing — Membership — Excess price of type-C flat collected — Fntitled for refund of interest charged, subsequent to year 2000, as by that time respondent had already paid original cost of changed category flat.
IV (2011) CPJ 159
Printer — Manufacturing defects — Repair — Damages towards financial loss, harassment — Installed at registered office of complainant — Not a commercial purpose.
IV (2011) CPJ 153
Motor Vehicle — Accident — Warranty Period — Repair charges collected — Refund of repair charges.
IV (2011) CPJ 151
Insurance — Organization can file a complaint against persons/body or corporation like appellant in interest of general public.
IV (2011) CPJ 151
Advertisement — Displayed or exhibited on buses — Unfair Trade Practice — Consumer — Contrary to Rule 127, Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 — Divert or distract attention of drivers of other vehicles on road — Compensation reduced.
IV (2011) CPJ 148
Banking and Financial Institutions Services — Loan — Purchase of computer — Insurance — Breakdown — Duty of bank to get all required risks covered under insurance cover.
IV (2011) CPJ 146
Service of Notice — Registered AD not received back undelivered — Period of more than one month passed — Deemed service — Proceeded against ex parte.
Sunjay Biotech Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Navdeep Bioceuticals —IV (2011) CPJ 146
IV (2011) CPJ 142
Club — Membership — Free air tickets and food vouchers not provided — Facilitation of booking of complimentary holidays not done — Unfair trade practice — Annual subscription fee charged — Non-booking of resort even after request, complainant could neither get air ticket booked nor able to use food vouchers — Complainant got frustrated and did not deposit annual subscription fee — Refund (Amount already deposited) with interest allowed.
IV (2011) CPJ 141
Insurance — Death by murder — Respondent herein did not object to findings of Forum in another case the death of insured was accidental — Principle of estoppel will stand in their way of taking a reverse stand in present case — Repudiation unjustified.
IV (2011) CPJ 130
Insurance ( Life ) — Death of Insured — Suppression of material facts — Claim repudiated on ground of concealment of physical disability/disorder — Accepting the premium and entering into agreement, Insurance Company cannot wriggle out of liability — Insurance policies should not be issued and repudiated in such casual and mechanical manner.
IV (2011) CPJ 123
Limitation — Condonation of delay — Delay of 361 days — Reason for delay is administrative and procedural — Not sufficient and convincing.
IV (2011) CPJ 515 (NC)
Insurance — Burglary — Surveyor appointed — Loss assessed — Claim repudiated — Exclusion clause — It is not necessary that person present at premises should necessarily be an employee of insured — It cannot be comprehended that security guard is not a lawful person in a business premises.
IV (2011) CPJ 496 (NC)
Jurisdiction — Pensionary benefits denied — Forum is not the appropriate authority because complainant cannot be treated as a consumer qua his employer.
IV (2011) CPJ 486 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Pregnancy period — Labour pains — Uterus membrane ruptured — Undue physical pressure exerted — Baby died — It is not legally permissible to hold doctor guilty merely because one set of medical literature not recommending use of Tramadol injection for labour pain relief since there is another opinion holding that administration of this analgesic is unlikely to have caused respiratory distress — Deep sympathies to complainant for their loss.
IV (2011) CPJ 481 (NC)
Builder — Development agreement entered — Breach of — Consumer — Statutory obligation not carried out.
IV (2011) CPJ 478 (NC)
Insurance — Fire — Stock gutted — Surveyor deducted 25%, not acceptable — Arbitrary deduction of 10% by State Commission acceptable.
IV (2011) CPJ 462 (NC)
Insurance — Fire — Surveyors appointed — Claim repudiated — No evidence to prove the same — There exist several circumstances on record which would leave no doubt that fire was accidental and loss occasioned due to fire is fully covered under Insurance Policy.
IV (2011) CPJ 458 (NC)
Insurance — Surveyor report — Forum has not given any cogent reasons to discard report of licensed surveyor and simply accepted version of complainant in respect of loss admissible as per rules — Mere production of bills or estimates cannot be the basis for discarding report of surveyor.
IV (2011) CPJ 458 (NC)
Surveyor Report — Forum has not given any cogent reasons to discard report of licensed surveyor and simply accepted version of complainant in respect of loss admissible as per rules — Mere production of bills or estimates cannot be the basis for discarding report of surveyor.
IV (2011) CPJ 457 (NC)
Practice and Procedure — Appeal had been filed against same order of Forum — Appeal had earlier been disposed of on merits by State Commission order which was not challenged and hence became final.
IV (2011) CPJ 455 (NC)
Jurisdiction — Consumer — Commercial space — Any person who avails services from a service provider for commercial purpose is not entitled to invoke jurisdiction of Consumer Fora.
IV (2011) CPJ 414 (NC)
Determination of Compensation — Multiplier method provided under Motor Vehicles Act for determination of compensation is only proper and scientific method for determination of compensation even in cases where death of patient has been occasioned due to medical negligence.
IV (2011) CPJ 414 (NC)
Apportionment of Awarded Compensation — Medical negligence — No strait-jacket formula.
IV (2011) CPJ 414 (NC)
Compensation — Foreign Courts award vis-a-vis Indian Courts award.
IV (2011) CPJ 414 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Wrongful treatment — Contributory negligence — Apportionment of liability — Supreme Court held medical negligence and remanded matter for deciding adequate compensation.
IV (2011) CPJ 411 (NC)
Housing — Allotment cancelled — Delay in payment of last instalment — Amount charged for delay highly disproportionate — Taking this into account quantum of lump sum compensation enhanced.
IV (2011) CPJ 398 (NC)
Negligence — Consumer — Restaurant roof collapsed — Absence of due care in maintenance of building, upkeeping of structure resulted into collapse — Service rendered at restaurant not only includes the service of quality food, proper service of waiters but also includes comfortable and safe infrastructure for consumption of eatables — Service of boarding is covered by Section 2(1)(o) of Act — Deficiency in service proved — Compensation awarded.
IV (2011) CPJ 392 (NC)
Plot — Allotment — Cancellation — Departmental Appellate Authority — Consumer Fora cannot sit on judgment after a consumer has adopted some route on his own free will to get relief from another competent Forum.
IV (2011) CPJ 390 (NC)
Banking and Financial Institutions Services — Agricultural loan — Death of ‘AS’, wife claimed for Rs. 1 lakh under Agricultural Securitization Scheme after deduction of loan amount — Failure to pay — Technical objections will not make any difference — Revision dismissed.
IV (2011) CPJ 385 (NC)
Shipment — Cargo — Delay in transportation — Specific time frame for delivery of consignment at Durban and also informed reason why consignment had to reach Durban in time — Negligence and deficiency in service on part of each respondent is writ large — Compensation enhanced.
IV (2011) CPJ 380 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Wrongful surgery — Patient expired — Attempted to manipulate indoor register record — Medical negligence is not only related to negligence in treatment of patient but is inclusive of impropriety in dealing with patient by conducting DNC procedure without preparing any record about the same — Negligence proved — Cost imposed.
IV (2011) CPJ 378 (NC)
Insurance — Theft — Insurance value of motor vehicle mentioned on which premium paid — No reduction in value of motor vehicle — Surveyor report purely guesswork and hearsay.
IV (2011) CPJ 376 (NC)
Education — Transfer to another institute — Entire fee for remaining years charged — Refund of fees — No loss to institution even course left in midstream — No bond/bank guarantee taken from respondent to effect that balance fee for whole course would be received by petitioner’s institute even if respondent left in the midstream — Part relief given to institution justified.
IV (2011) CPJ 361 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Post-operative treatment — Patient expired — Contract of bacterial infection in a timely manner it would not have led to septicemia which eventually caused death of patient — Negligence proved.
IV (2011) CPJ 358 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Surgery of nose performed — Serious complications post-surgery — Continuous cause of action — Continuous medical consultation and treatment between the alleged surgery in 2002 and the filing of the consumer complaint in 2004 — Matter remanded for fresh consideration.
IV (2011) CPJ 356 (NC)
Housing — Allotment under disabled persons quota — Instalment facility for paying balance cost — Initial scheme envisaged payment of balance cost of house in a number of instalments — Petitioner should grant facility of instalment payment.
IV (2011) CPJ 354 (NC)
Limitation — Continued cause of action — Allotment — Cancellation — Refund of amount — Set-off against cost of new plot — Complainant continued to have valid and continuing interest in allotment of alternative plot of land in lieu of that under cancelled scheme.
IV (2011) CPJ 343 (NC)
Equity — Principles — No leniency should be shown to litigants who in order to cover up their own fault and negligence, goes on filing meritless petitions — Such unscrupulous litigants whose only aim and object is to deprive opposite party of the fruits of decree must be dealt with heavy hands.
IV (2011) CPJ 338 (NC)
Education — Discontinuation of course — Refund of amount — When all the 10 seats were filled up and one seat could not be filled up due to absence of response from fourth candidate, it cannot be said that respondents suffered financial loss due to withdrawal of petitioner in middle of educational year.
IV (2011) CPJ 323 (NC)
Insurance — Accident claim — Surveyor appointed — Claim repudiated — Principle of indemnity does not permit complete renewal of bus body when appropriate repairs would reinstate the insured bus to its pre-accident status — Surveyor’s assessment based on such repairs cannot be thrown overboard merely on ground that insured complainant chose instead to get the bus body completely replaced.
IV (2011) CPJ 318 (NC)
Electricity — Excess sanctioned load — Disconnection— Service of mandatory notice has not been proved by petitioner.
IV (2011) CPJ 314 (NC)
Airlines —Preponement charges — Delay in boarding — Non-joinder of parties — Agent had implicit authority to collect entire cost of ticket on behalf of principal — Not open to appellant to claim that they are not responsible for lapse of agent — Non-joinder of travel agent as a party to proceedings before State Commission does not arise — Compensation granted.
IV (2011) CPJ 309 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Improper Diagnosis — Improper treatment — Evidence produced by respondent in respect of his subsequent treatment, surgery and medical opinion of doctors are adequate proof in support of his case of medical negligence against the petitioner/doctor — Negligence proved — Order of State Commission upheld.
IV (2011) CPJ 300 (NC)
Motor Vehicles — Manufacturing defect — Unfair trade practice — Old car given and not brand new one manufactured in 2000 — Manufacturer only held guilty of compensation granted for mental agony and harassment caused.
IV (2011) CPJ 294 (NC)
Insurance — Accident claim — Surveyor appointed — Claim repudiated — Contention not accepted — Cost of Rs. 50,000 imposed on Insurance Company.
IV (2011) CPJ 285 (NC)
Land — Purchased — Not registered — Refund of amount with interest and cost.
IV (2011) CPJ 280 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Wrongful Surgery — Patient expired — In a complicated case, without support of any expert’s opinion, complainant’s case of alleged medical negligence cannot be accepted only on basis of her affidavit or some entries in medical record — Negligence not proved.
IV (2011) CPJ 276 (NC)
Insurance — Fire — Stocks gutted — Claim repudiated on account of fraud not accepted — Fabricated/objectionable Bills deducted by surveyor — Entire claim cannot be repudiated.
IV (2011) CPJ 273 (NC)
Insurance — Fire — Stocks gutted — Wrong assessment by surveyor — Damage to building extensive yet loss assessed by surveyor not realistic.
IV (2011) CPJ 268 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Lack of infrastructure — Not accepted — Primary health care with basic medical facilities supported by availability of a hierarchy of higher levels of medical treatment in appropriate cases is generally accepted model of public health facilities — No negligence.
IV (2011) CPJ 268 (NC)
Medical Negligence — Wrongful treatment — No medical literature cited or furnished by appellant — OPs have produced wide range of medical literature from reputed sources to rebut said allegation — Negligence not proved.
IV (2011) CPJ 267 (NC)
Insurance — Accident claim — Vehicle overloaded — Breach of policy conditions — Overloading of passengers led to higher momentum of mini bus which could not be controlled and led to the impact and caused extreme damage.
IV (2011) CPJ 261 (NC)
Insurance ( Life ) — Suppression of material facts — Full premium not paid before death — No proposal had come into force — Repudiation justified.
IV (2011) CPJ 99
Execution — Limitation — Restoration — Fresh execution — Forum dismissed application — Hence appeal — Limitation for giving an execution application under law is 12 years — Decree holder can give more than one application and need not ask for restoration because a fresh application can be entertained — Decree holder may file fresh execution application before District Forum.
IV (2011) CPJ 97
Sterilization — Unwanted pregnancy occurred — Non-consumer dispute — Methods of sterilization are not hundred percent safe — Unwanted pregnancy can be terminated and is legal and permissible under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Unreasoned judgment quashed.
IV (2011) CPJ 91
Medical Negligence — Chemotherapy — Ulcer developed at point of injunction of chemotherapy — Doctor must give prescription with proper instructions to patient.
IV (2011) CPJ 88
Jurisdiction — Tubewell — Failed to pump water — Refund of amount — Questions to be decided by Fora being complex and complicated, their proper adjudication would require recording of detailed and voluminous evidence as well as examining of expert witnesses — Remedy in Civil Court.
IV (2011) CPJ 85
Consumer — Locus standi — Complainant not a nominee under policy but is a legal heir and could have made an insurance claim — She is a consumer and has locus standi to file consumer complaint.
IV (2011) CPJ 62 (SC)
Jurisdiction — Remedy available with Authorities — When an allottee files an Appeal or avails the remedy available with the Authorities he cannot move the forum/State Commission/National Commission, III (2006) CPJ 136 (NC).
IV (2011) CPJ 62 (SC)
Auction — Interest — Purchase of shop — Further amount not paid — Appeal filed before Administrator — Matter remanded to National Commission in view of Surinder Mohan v. Municipal Corporation and Anr., III (2006) CPJ 136 (NC).
IV (2011) CPJ 62
Practice and Procedure — Document — District Forum failed to analyse document and not given opportunity to parties to contest case — Matter remanded back.
IV (2011) CPJ 55
Insurance — Theft — Claim time-barred — Claim repudiated — Claim remained undecided, cause of action will continue till Insurance Company pays or rejects the claim.
I (2011) CPJ 279
JURISDICTION Defect in computers Consumer Fora cannot run away from its responsibility by referring parties to Civil Court Matter remanded back.
I (2011) CPJ 275
BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SERVICES Joint account Instructions given to bank that current account to be operated jointly and not singularly Amount transferred into account of partners separate concern amounts to deficiency in service.
I (2011) CPJ 261
MOTOR VEHICLES Defect of vehicle stands not discredited Complainant has used the vehicle Compensation granted.
I (2011) CPJ 248
INSURANCE Theft committed by friend Friend had dishonest intention at time of taking away car Complainants consent that friend act amounted to loss of vehicle Repudiation justified.
I (2011) CPJ 242
PROVIDENT FUND Pension not given OPs not able to produce that complainant did not have continuous service Deficiency proved.
I (2011) CPJ 240
TELEGRAPH Telegram not delivered Government cannot be held liable for any loss or damage due to non-delivery of any message, complainant not liable to refund full charges after expiry of stipulated period.
I (2011) CPJ 235
EVIDENCE Oral statement would not meet requirement of positive proof.
I (2011) CPJ 229
JURISDICTION Territorial Delhi is one unit being a Union Territory Divided into 10 Districts according to police stations only for administrative convenience Complaint maintainable.
I (2011) CPJ 222
EDUCATION Non-refund of fees Claim made after 2 years, barred by limitation No consideration or service offered for scholarship, no claim could be laid Claim not maintainable.
I (2011) CPJ 217
HOUSING Plots booked Registration not done OP committed unfair trade practice by demanding remaining amount prior to registration OP to pay amount equivalent to present price of plot with interest and costs.
I (2011) CPJ 214
AMENDMENT Belated attempt to insert some facts, not tenable and maintainable under law Proposed amendment not necessary for deciding real questions and
controversies between parties.
I (2011) CPJ 210
ELECTRICITY Theft Overhauling of account In absence of exact details, respondents directed to overhaul account of appellant upto the period of 6 months from the appellants premises.
I (2011) CPJ 207
INSURANCE Building and stock damaged due to heavy rain Quantum of loss assessed by Surveyor is unjust and low OP directed to pay the loss caused and compensation.
I (2011) CPJ 206
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Incorrect reports Wrong diagnosis Declaration that patient suffering from HIV made without due care Negligence proved.
I (2011) CPJ 197
INSURANCE Accident Learners driving licence is valid licence Repudiation unjustified.
I (2011) CPJ 191
INSURANCE Accidental benefit policy Denied In claim statement cause of death shown as fever Story of snake bite concocted by complainant to avail accidental benefit Accidental benefit rightly denied.
I (2011) CPJ 188
JURISDICTION Housing Transfer of plot Matter pending for litigation, required determination by Civil Court Appellants justified in refusing to transfer plot to respondents No deficiency proved.
I (2011) CPJ 186
Theft of vehicle Claim repudiated Vehicle used for hire purpose and policy for private use In case of theft nature of vehicle cannot be looked Repudiation unjustified.
I (2011) CPJ 160
SECURITIES F.D.R. amount not returned Refund not paid and society closed OP ordered to pay principal amount.
I (2011) CPJ 152
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Wrongful treatment Cancer patient detained in hospital without referring to specialist treatment Joint and several liability of both doctor and hospital.
I (2011) CPJ 150
BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SERVICES Insurance amount adjusted in loan account of third party No evidence to show that family of complainant and his uncle was joint family Deficiency in service proved.
I (2011) CPJ 143
MEDICLAIM Reimbursement Suppression of material facts No policy produced to show condition that pre-existing disease excluded for reimbursement No prior knowledge of disease to complainant Repudiation unjustified.
I (2011) CPJ 135
MEDICLAIM Reimbursement Claim repudiated As per policy treatment, which requires hospitalization is only payable Claim has been repudiated on basis of whimsical and self-contradictory grounds Individual suffering from major depressive disorder cannot be managed at home where suicidal attempt is significantly high Deficiency in service proved.
I (2011) CPJ 125
INSURANCE Agreement Coercive bargaining Court may strike down an unfair and unreasonable contract when called upon Complainant protested Clause will be no help to insurer.
I (2011) CPJ 111
BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SERVICES Theft from locker Ornaments missing O.P. Bank negligent in ensuring security of locker as a result burglary took place Deficiency proved Complainant is entitled to compensation.
I (2011) CPJ 111
JURISDICTION Pendency of criminal case will not make complaint unmaintainable as reliefs sought are different in nature.
I (2011) CPJ 111
CRIMINAL CASE Pendency of criminal case will not make complaint unmaintainable as reliefs sought are different in nature.
I (2011) CPJ 66
VISA Refund of Fees All documents and fees were paid by complainant OP failed to process his case OP cheated complainant by not being authorized agency Deficiency proved.
I (2011) CPJ 43 (NC)
INSURANCE Property damaged Natural calamity Poultry farm suffered huge damage in cyclone Plea of OP that Fora interfered with Surveyors report in absence of any material evidence is not accepted.
I (2011) CPJ 41 (NC)
POSTAL SERVICES PPF Account On maturity complainant was not paid full amount with interest Award of interest @ 6% p.a. on deposits made after 31.12.2005 was most equitable and rationale.
I (2011) CPJ 38
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Wrong surgery Deceased never made contact with OP No. 2 regarding further treatment after leaving hospital and moved from one hospital to another Not proper to fasten blame on OP No. 2 as his expertise, experience and surgical skill have nowhere been questioned Deficiency not proved.
I (2011) CPJ 26 (NC)
EDUCATION Incorrect certificate issued Complainant cannot be a consumer who appeared at SSC examination and OP cannot be called service provider.
I (2011) CPJ 25 (NC)
MEDICLAIM Reimbursement Imposition of restriction in exclusion clause in policy was a unilateral action Repudiation unjustified.
I (2011) CPJ 15
AIRLINES Delay of flight Technical delay not explained No suitable transport facility made available Deficiency in service proved.
I (2011) CPJ 4 (SC)
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Practice and Procedure Need for communication of order If an order is passed but not communicated to party concerned, it does not create any legal right which can be enforced through Court of Law, as it does not become effective till it is communicated.
I (2011) CPJ 3
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Infected blood transfused Blood transfused to complainants wife without testing OPs negligent in performing their duty Compensation granted would suffice to meet ends of justice.
I (2011) CPJ 1 (SC)
CONSUMER Software amount to sale of goods by appellant for commercial purposes Respondent not a consumer.
I (2011) CPJ 1
INSURANCE Housing loan Policy issued shows that in case of accident, the liability was limited to loan amount outstanding Once undertaking is given OPs cannot withdraw said benefit Principal amount of deceased would be waived off and complainant would be liable to pay remaining amount to OPs.
I (2011) CPJ 1 (NC)
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Overdose of Medicine Deceased expired Negligence proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 7
ADVERTISEMENT Promotional Scheme Complainant entry made through proper channel not considered Admitted position that entry was preceding first five valid entries Deficiency not proved General deficiency established which amounts to unfair trade practice.
IV (2010) CPJ 45 (SC)
APPOINTMENT AS MEMBER Name of appellant recommended by entire body of Selection Committee i.e. Chairman and members Respondent had nothing to do with appointment of member High Court erred in entertaining writ petition.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 81
APPEAL Appeal could not be entertained Money not deposited as per rules.
IV (2010) CPJ 293
BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SERVICES Deposit not refunded after death to legal heirs Legal heirs entitled to receive amount on pro-rata basis from liquidator.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 134
Depositors FDR maturity amount deducted arbitrarily Amalgamation of Banks Scheme formulated by Government of India after due notification in public interest No deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 72
Draft lost Indemnity bond Bank expected to pay draft amount without insisting on indemnity bond Entitled to refund amount, cost of litigation and interest.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 210
Fixed Deposits Premature withdrawal of Fixed Deposit amount Bank not produced any evidence of disbursal of amount Fraud and embezzlement committed by employees of Bank Vicarious liability Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 346
Floating rate of interest OP gave loan to complainant at floating rate of interest Amount debited from complainants account amounts to deficiency in service.
IV (2010) CPJ 315
Increase in Interest Loan Floating rate of interest increased before time even after agreement Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 385 (NC)
Loan Appropriation of Saving Bank amount Cheque submitted Amount not released by bank Loan amount not repaid by person for whom respondent gave surety No notice received for outstanding loan amount Respondent stood surety for loan advanced Prior notice sent by bank Bank justified in appropriating amount from respondents saving bank towards outstanding loan amount.
IV (2010) CPJ 402 (NC)
Loan Default in making instalments Forceful repossession Repossession of vehicle forcibly without serving any notice is violation of principles of natural justice.
IV (2010) CPJ 284
Loan Non-production of mill, complainant unable to repay loan Appellant not consumer as connection applied for business denoting commercial purpose Bank sanctioned loan without physical verification Complaint misconceived.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 58
Loan Upfront fee paid Delay in sanction Petitioner cannot withhold refund Award modified to the extent that respondent not entitled to interest and compensation.
IV (2010) CPJ (SC) 27
CAUSE OF ACTION If effect of negligence is patent, cause of action will arise on date when negligence was done If latent then when patient discovers harm.
IV (2010) CPJ 299 (NC)
COMMERCIAL PURPOSE Private limited company purchased space for commercial purpose Not a consumer.
IV (2010) CPJ 283
COMPENSATION Enhancement No rule for granting compensation for harassment and mental agony Each case has to be decided according to its own circumstances.
IV (2010) CPJ 397 (NC)
Reduction Complainant entitled to refund for flight between Jammu and Srinagar No financial loss suffered Lump sum compensation awarded.
IV (2010) CPJ 284
CONSUMER Commercial purpose Electric connection applied for business of husking mill denoting commercial purpose Complainant not a consumer.
IV (2010) CPJ 252
Complainant handed over wood to OPs to make furniture Contention of OP that father is running furniture business and he has no connection not accepted Person who contacted complainant would be liable Complainant is consumer.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 30
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS VIS-A-VIS CONSUMER FORA PROCEEDINGS Consumer Fora additional remedy Object of both proceedings distinct and different Rightful claim not defeated by initiation of criminal proceedings.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 30
DEPOSITS Failed to make payment of interest accrued on deposits Complaint Maintainability Criminal proceedings pending before Special Court Consumer Fora additional remedy Object of both proceedings distinct and different Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 80
DRUG ADDICT Non-disclosure amounts to suppression of material facts
IV (2010) CPJ 396 (NC)
EDUCATION Balance fee not returned Charging fees in advance beyond current year would amount to unfair trade practice.
IV (2010) CPJ 318 (NC)
Change of institution Return of tuition fee OP1 returned some part of fee OPs 1 and 2 cannot be allowed to take plea of advertisement and deny refund of fees and other charges Guidelines issued by U.G.C. provide for refund of fees.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 63
Coaching Centre Non-refund of fees Unfair trade practice No compensation since candidate withdrawn of her own No justification for deducting administrative charges No merit.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 109
Ill-treatment and harassment by coaching institute Victim committed suicide High Court dismissed writ petition Ground on which relief sought negated by High Court National Commission cannot go against High Court No relief.
IV (2010) CPJ 53
ELECTRICITY Defective meter Period for which bill is issued, factory was shut Deficiency proved Bill cancelled.
IV (2010) CPJ 380
Extension of load from ground to first floor Amount deposited No justification of appellants to claim electricity charges from respondent beyond normal rates Fresh bills on normal charges be issued.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 151
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND Superannuation pension Fixed Rs. 1,125 instead of Rs. 1,529 Services rendered 24 years prior to 1995 and 8 years after 1985 Petitioner shall pay arrears of pension with interest and costs.
IV (2010) CPJ 425
GOODS Television Burnt Not repaired or replaced under warranty period Respondent attributing cause of burning due to putting burning candle over TV set Duty of respondent to establish by expert report, no evidence produced Duty of respondent to repair free of cost as television under warranty.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 55
HOUSING Allotment Hire Purchase Scheme Three instalments paid, rest to be paid after allotment Possession not delivered 20% from refunded amount wrongly deducted in absence of any legal provisions or rules providing for such deduction Forum order upheld.
IV (2010) CPJ 319
Allotment Lump sum amount mentioned in allotment letter OP cannot mention some other price when executing sale agreement Concluded contract Deficiency proved Unfair trade practice.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 270
Allotment Non-refund on account of subsequent allotment Amount should be refunded by petitioner to respondent as he had paid to original allottee entire amount and interest Penalty imposed on petitioner by imposing 10% interest on interest amount to be refunded to the respondents, not justified.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 231
Allotment Petitioner gave up plan to build 9 towers, agreed to give flat in any of 5 towers located at same site at old price Offer not acceptable Directed to refund amount deposited without interest because fair and reasonable offer not acceptable.
IV (2010) CPJ 300 (NC)
Allotment Possession Non-delivery 10% of amount deducted as per policy Respondent could not be expected to wait for an indefinite period for letter of offer of possession cannot be made to suffer for acts of omission and commission of petitioner.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 226
Builder Deficiency in construction House yet to be built cannot be sold on as-is-where-is basis as stated in brochure Deficiency in rendering service proved Incomplete house cannot be given for possession.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 100
Penal interest charged Complainant not a late entrant to the scheme Deficiency proved Refund of excess amount directed with interest from date of deposit.
IV (2010) CPJ 289
Purchase of immovable property is a simple transaction Division of plot and mutation has nothing to do with housing construction Not a consumer complaint No deficiency in service.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 39
Refund of Earnest Money Complainant could not claim status of consumer of services rendered by petitioner once his application for allotment of land was not successful in draw of lots Not a consumer No consumer dispute.
IV (2010) CPJ 191
Transfer of land purchased in open auction Plot purchased by original allottee in an open auction cannot be termed as consumer.
IV (2010) CPJ 321 (NC)
INSURANCE Accident Claim repudiated Breach of policy conditions and law Vehicle not carrying valid documents Repudiation justified.
IV (2010) CPJ 339
Accident Repudiation of claim Surveyor's report may be basis for settlement of claim but not binding Both interest and compensation cannot be awarded.
IV (2010) CPJ 281
Accident claim Bills include expenses not covered under policy Insurance Company not liable for parts not damaged by accident Not entitled to claim.
IV (2010) CPJ 389 (NC)
Accident claim Repudiation Fake insurance cover note On receipt of the premium amount by agent, Insurance Company becomes liable for acts of omission and commission of its agent Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 330
Accident claim repudiated L.P.G. kit was installed much before insurance cover was taken Duty of Insurer to check car thoroughly before giving cover note Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 34
Accident Fall Paralysed Permanent disability No pre-existing disease No evidence produced by Insurance Company Entitled to 100% of insurance amount Repudiation unjustified.
IV (2010) CPJ 437
Bankers Indemnity Policy Forgery O.P. directed to pay losses as per limit of insurance cover for acts and commissions of employees, but on the other hand exception excludes liability for losses by any negligent act of insureds employee Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 38 (SC)
Breach of Policy Conditions Non-communication Repudiation Each and every consignment not declared Repudiation justified.
IV (2010) CPJ 371
Crop loan Collection of premia from complainant and keeping it with OP No. 3 frustrates purpose of collection of amount Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 442
Fire Full and final settlement of claim Loss suffered much more Once complainant had received amount in full and final settlement cannot re-open case unless plea of fraud, misrepresentation is alleged.
IV (2010) CPJ 60 (SC)
Fire Goods and shops damaged Repudiation Commissions failed to consider document produced by appellant which had been considered by District Forum while awarding compensation Matter remitted to State Commission.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 95
Fire Loss or damage to stock Unjust to deprive of legitimate claim, once peril under policy admitted by Insurance Company Surveyor report casts suspicion over genuineness of Bills.
IV (2010) CPJ 376
One leg lost in accident Terms of policy clearly shows that if insured loss one of his foot, then he is entitled to 50% of sum assured Repudiation not justified.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 68
Fire Policy states that finished goods and accessories are also included Surveyor erred in loss of finished goods and loss caused to tools and accessories Forums order upheld.
IV (2010) CPJ 395
Fire Surveyor report not justified Loss assessed by Surveyor in all products is without any justification and non-rational Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 213
Marine Policy Non-delivery of consignment Claim repudiated Basis, as peril of non-delivery is independent of theft or pilferage of consignment Complainant entitled to reimbursement of reasonable expenditure incurred for minimizing loss.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 141
Mediclaim Non-renewal of policy by company Policy since 1994-95 Renewed from time-to-time till 2002 No evidence in laxity on part of petitioners about payment of premium beyond due time Petitioner eligible for renewal of mediclaim policy Directions issued.
IV (2010) CPJ 76
Mediclaim (Overseas) Loss of passport Repudiation of claim on want of necessary documents Mistake of complainant in misplacing passport No deficiency in service proved Only actual fees reimbursed.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 263
Mediclaim policy Repudiation Exclusion clause pertains to first 30 days but this will not apply if panel of medical practitioners opine that insured person did not know about existence of disease at time of applying for insurance Panel was not constituted Deficiency in service proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 274
Shopkeepers and Office Protection Shield Insurance Policy Theft Claim repudiated Cover notes in policies not restricted to any floor Repudiation unjustified.
IV (2010) CPJ 287
Theft Laptop stolen from unlocked car Claim repudiated Laptop in custody of owner during transit which cannot be taken as left unattended Repudiation unjustified.
IV (2010) CPJ 297 (NC)
Theft Vehicle Breach of policy conditions reasonable care not taken Driver not expected to carry key while getting down to answer natures call Claim be settled on non-standard basis.
IV (2010) CPJ 312
Theft of car within four months of purchase Only 75% amount paid Insurer is not entitled to reduce purchase value of vehicle Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 163
Theft Surveyor appointed Claim repudiated being fraudulent Surveyor report stated all documents fake Contention rejected Complainant deprived by money Deficiency proved Compensation with interest directed.
IV (2010) CPJ 242
Vehicle missing Claim repudiated Word booking used by complainant cannot be concluded that vehicle used for hire or reward No letter issued for repudiation or settlement which itself is an act of deficiency in service Repudiation not justified.
IV (2010) CPJ 189
INSURANCE (LIFE) Suppression of material facts Husband died Complainants husband obtained two life insurance policies Claim repudiated Complainants husband could not be held guilty on basis of suspicious treatment slip Repudiation unjustified.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 80
Suppression of material facts Life assured a drug addict Non-disclosure amounts to suppression of material facts.
IV (2010) CPJ (SC) 7
INTEREST Forum awarded interest @ 18% Commission reduced rate of interest @ 15% Award of interest @ 15% is not interest in substance, but it is to compensate respondents by way of damages for loss in terms of money, mental agony and other sufferings.
IV (2010) CPJ 315
JURISDICTION Consumer Fora has alternative remedy Banking Ombudsman is not a statutory authority Consumer after claiming relief in front of Banking Ombudsman can approach Consumer Fora.
IV (2010) CPJ (SC) 9
Non-allotment of flats Forum had jurisdiction to entertain complaints filed by members of societies Members of societies have every right to complain against illegal, arbitrary and unjustified forfeiture of 10% earnest money and non-refund of 18% interest.
IV (2010) CPJ 263
Not open to complainant to file fresh complaint on same facts after getting adverse finding from forum under Electricity Act.
IV (2010) CPJ 234
arallel Proceedings Civil suit filed by OP is pending before Civil Court therefore parallel proceedings for same cause of action cannot be sustained.
IV (2010) CPJ 429
Sovereign Authority Consumer Land leased from Government Lease-hold be converted into free-hold on payment of fees Decisions of premium payable for lease and fees for conversion into free hold, taken by Government as policy decision OPs executed sovereign act of Government Apex Court mandates consumer Fora are quasi-judicial authorities Cannot assume jurisdiction between sovereign authority and any person Complainant not a consumer.
IV (2010) CPJ 426
Telephone Connection disconnected Special Act overcomes General Act Consumer Fora has no jurisdiction Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act would apply Order of Fora below set-aside.
IV (2010) CPJ 196
Territorial Ticket purchased at Jammu Part of cause of action arose at Jammu Forum has jurisdiction.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 73
L.P.G. Fire Wife expired Complainant a bona fide customer Consolidated compensation awarded Liable jointly and severally.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 28
LIMITATION Condonation of Delay Advocate not pursuing the matter, O.P should be penalized Delay condoned and ex parte order set aside.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 44
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Discharge Summary Making a totally wrong mention of surgery is a serious lapse which is an act of negligence on part of nursing home Compensation awarded.
IV (2010) CPJ (SC) 27
Discovery rule evolved because it was found that strict adherence to statute of limitation defeat claims of medical negligence.
IV (2010) CPJ 359 (NC)
Gall Bladder stone surgery Treatment Burden to prove that surgery performed by OP No. 2 negligently which ultimately led to her death Contradictory expert evidence Negligence not proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 50 (SC)
Wrong treatment Developed gangrene Left leg amputated Record pertaining to treatment held back from State Commission Matter remanded back.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 112
Malignancy Surgery Radiotherapy given for 36 hours Alleged defective line of treatment FNAC reports by AIIMS was erroneous Negligence established Compensation justified with costs.
IV (2010) CPJ 211
Operation defective Post-mortem report mentions death due to complications which arose while performing surgery OP3 not a qualified allopathic doctor Shifting of deceased after death amounts to cheating Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (SC) 27
Post-operative complications Respondent kept quiet for about 9 years despite pain and agony Long silence militates against bona fides of claim for compensation No negligence proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 1
Surgery Injury to nerves caused during surgery Disability permanent or functional, failed to bring cogent material No enhancement of compensation.
IV (2010) CPJ 400 (NC)
Surgical operation Wrong treatment Doctors cannot be guarantors of absolute safety as reactionary hemorrhage is one of complications entailed in surgical operations Deficiency not proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 257
Treatment O.P. not guilty because it pursued a particular line of treatment different from another hospital Deficiency not proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 335 (NC)
MEDICLAIM Claim received under protest Signed voucher does not operate estoppel as right of consumer Complainant failed to make out case of undue influence, coercive bargaining fraud or promise that balance be paid later Deficiency not proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 272
MEDICLAIM POLICY Repudiation Suppression of material facts Non-disclosure of menstruation problems not suppression Repudiation unjustified.
IV (2010) CPJ 200
Suppression of material facts Claim repudiated Symptoms of disease not known to complainants wife Illness as a result of degenerative changes is a chronic and long drawn progressive disorder Suppression not proved Repudiation not justified.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 241
MOTOR VEHICLES Manufacturing defect Consent order passed directing dealer and manufacturer to pay jointly and severally No appeal or revision maintainable against consent order Cannot be challenged except where consent obtained by fraud, duress or misrepresentation.
IV (2010) CPJ 56 (SC)
Manufacturing defect Vehicle certified to be roadworthy Complaints duly attended Commissions order reasonable.
IV (2010) CPJ 227
POSTAL SERVICES Registered post delivered at wrong address Evidence established on record Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 301 (NC)
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Cross appeals filed by parties leading to contradictory orders In order to bring uniformity, order passed in subsequent appeal set aside.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 191
RAILWAYS Luggage stolen No immediate action taken by TTE No dereliction of duty proved Railways not vigilant at time of distress Public service organisations expected to be courteous and proactive Deficiency not proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 61 (SC)
REASONED ORDERS Quasi-judicial authority must record reasons in support of its conclusion It is virtually life blood of judicial decision making justifying the principle that reason is the soul of justice.
IV (2010) CPJ 252
RENOVATION Wood work Entire teak wood handed over not utilized and inferior quality wood used Misappropriation of wood amounts to unfair trade practice Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ 294 (NC)
SECURITIES Tax Saver Fund Units Non-allotment, complainant suffered burden of extra taxes Delay in returning application and cheque resulted in denying prospective investor of tax benefit Deficiency proved.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 123
Shares Allotment Notional gain/loss Applications submitted, rejected RBI directions Deficiency alleged and proved on two counts Price which could be adopted for calculating notional gain/loss that complainant would have made had they been allotted 12,400 shares of Corporation Bank and disposed them off on the first available listing date Bank directed to pay notional loss with interest.
IV (2010) CPJ 394 (NC)
TELEPHONE Franchisee for PCO Non-deposit of Bill Disconnected P.C.O. running for commercial purpose Franchisee would not be considered as consumer under Consumer Protection Act.
IV (2010) CPJ 403
Mobile Bill not paid Disconnection O.P. 3 did not send cheque to O.P. 4 for collection O.P. 3 alone deficient in service O.P. 1 not liable for deficiency in service.
IV (2010) CPJ 406
TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION Agreement High Court of Allahabad and its subordinate Court to have jurisdiction Right to enter into agreement is a constitutional right unless same barred by legal provision Parties for their own convenience can get a matter settled, by a Tribunal, of a particular law.
IV (2010) CPJ (NC) 65
TOURS AND TRAVEL Changes and deviations from given itinerary People opt for such tours they do have expectations and preferences about specific places, due to changes respondent suffered both inconvenience and disappointment Deficiency in service Fora order upheld.
IV (2010) CPJ 278
Tickets misplaced Failed to issue duplicate tickets Non-refund of money Rule 3(2) of Carriage Act provides that loss of passenger ticket not affects validity of contract of carriage Duplicate tickets could be issued Deficiency proved.