III (2005) CCR
381 (Cal.)
Attempt to Murder : To sustain conviction
under Section 307, IPC, intention to kill should be clearly
proved by circumstances like persistence of attacks on
vital parts of body.
III (2005) CCR
385 (Pat.)
Bail : Refusal/Grant : Consideration,
serious matter : To be balanced with interest of society
at large vis-a-vis accused : Antecedent of person seeking
bail one of prime considerations.
III (2005) CCR
440 (Del.)
Bank Guarantee : Quashing of order
directing release of bank guarantee executed in favour
of petitioner by accused: Challenge against on ground
that Courts below did not have any jurisdiction to decide
question primarily fell within domain of Civil Courts
: Bank Guarantee submitted for benefit of petitioner.
III (2005) CCR
331 (Pat.)
Breach of Trust by Custodians of Law
within Premises of Police Station : Direct evidence about
misappropriation not available, only circumstances can
be analysed with care and caution.
III (2005) CCR
372 (Del.) (DB)
Cognizance of Offence by Magistrate
: Discharge of Accused : Powers of Magistrate : Before
taking cognizance, if Magistrate thinks fit, he may postpone
issue of process against accused and direct investigation
to be made by Police Officer or by such other person as
he thinks fit.
III (2005) CCR
393 (Ker.)
Compensation : Compensation for accusation
without reasonable cause : Crime registered suo motu by
2nd respondent in his capacity as Sub-Inspector.
III (2005) CCR
407 (SC)
Criminal Intimidation : Words had more
sound and fury than substance : It cannot be concluded
applicants committed offence punishable under Section
506-II, IPC : Impugned order quashed.
III (2005) CCR
372 (Del.) (DB)
Discharge of Accused : Obligation is
cast on Magistrate, before framing charge, to hear accused
as well as prosecution to satisfy himself whether charge
against accused is groundless or not : Only after being
satisfied, charge to be framed.
III (2005) CCR
354 (Del.)
Discharge : Sanction for Prosecution
: Respondent scored out words "SASUR" from petition and
initialled cutting as deponent only talked about mother-in-law
(SAAS) : Petitioner recorded statement in discharge of
his official duties and scored out words "SASUR" in his
official capacity and in discharge of his official duty
: Even if act complained of mala fide act, same will remain
act done in discharge of his official duty : Bar under
Section 197, Cr.P.C. will be attracted: Impugned order
of ASJ incorrect and set aside and petitioner discharged.
III (2005) CCR
368 (A.P.)
Dishonour of Cheque : Cheques returned
with endorsement as "not a clearing member" : Offence
under Section 138 not made out.
III (2005) CCR
383 (Mad.)
Dishonour of Cheque : Notice : Cheque
amount not clear in notice : Notice imperfect and defective
in law.
III (2005) CCR
351 (Bom.)
Dishonour of Cheque : Presumption :
Writing/note produced by accused clearly indicated cheques
were given by way of security.
III (2005) CCR
324 (Del.)
Dishonour of Cheque : Quashing of Complaint
: Premature Complaint: Complaint cannot be quashed on
that ground : Cognizance of complaint by Magistrate cannot
defeat claim of complainant.
III (2005) CCR
411 (Del.)
Dishonour of Cheque : "Stop Payment"
: Sufficient to summon petitioners : For examining complaint
in petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. this Court can
only see whether allegations in complaint as substantiated
in pre-summoning evidence sufficient to summon petitioners.
III (2005) CCR
428 (A.P.)
Dispensing personal appearance : Dishonour
of Cheque : Dispensing personal appearance of accused
and examination of accused : Exemption could be granted
in appropriate cases.
III (2005) CCR
329 (Jhar.)
Essential Commodities : Quashing of
Criminal Proceedings : Concealment of foodgrains in unauthorised
godowns : Seizure : Block Development Officer in question
not authorised under E.C. Act to make search and seizure
of articles.
III (2005) CCR
331 (Pat.)
Misappropriation by Police Officers
: Compensation : Attachment of Salary: Seized medicines
not available in Malkhana and no body's case that they
can be traced or recovered : Misappropriation by concerned
police officials : Proper to direct to determine cost
of seized medicines illegally not released to petitioner.
III (2005) CCR
315 (H.P.)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
: Search : "Belief and Suspicion" are two different stages
of mind and cannot be treated at par : Mere suspicion
not enough to attract provisions of Section 50.
III (2005) CCR
407 (M.P.)
Obscenity : Sanction for Prosecution
: It is no part of official duty to commit offences :
An official is not expected to give abuses or threats
: No sanction under Section 197, Cr.P.C. necessary.
III (2005) CCR
407 (M.P.)
Obscenity : To constitute offence under
Section 294, IPC, words must be uttered in public place
: Words uttered in close chamber of applicant No. 1 :
Obscene words not uttered in or near public place.
III (2005) CCR
337 (Ori.)
Prosecution Evidence : Recalling of
prosecution witness amounts to reopening of prosecution
evidence.
III (2005) CCR
337 (Ori.)
Recalling of prosecution witness :
Prosecution Evidence : Recalling of prosecution witness
amounts to reopening of prosecution evidence: It cannot
be deemed that prosecution evidence closed.
III (2005) CCR
381 (Cal.)
Revision : Inherent Powers: Where particular
order expressly barred under Section 397(2) and cannot
be subject matter of revision by High Court, to such case
provision of Section 482 would not apply.
III (2005) CCR
381 (Cal.)
Revision : Interlocutory Order : Order
framing charge is interlocutory order as it does not decide
question of guilt or innocence of accused : It is not
vulnerable in revision.
III (2005) CCR
354 (Del.)
Sanction for Prosecution : Respondent
scored out words "SASUR" from petition and initialled
cutting as deponent only talked about mother-in-law (SAAS)
: Petitioner recorded statement in discharge of his official
duties and scored out words "SASUR" in his official capacity
and in discharge of his official duty : Even if act complained
of mala fide act, same will remain act done in discharge
of his official duty : Bar under Section 197, Cr.P.C.
will be attracted.
III (2005) CCR
354 (Del.)
Sanction for Prosecution : Scope of
Provision : To claim benefit accused must show reasonable
connection between act complained of and discharge of
official duty.
III (2005) CCR
416 (Raj.)
Set-Off : Set-off of period of detention
in police and judicial custody during investigation, inquiry
and trial : Permissible : Benefit of set-off under Section
428, Cr.P.C. available to applicant like other life convicts.
III (2005) CCR
436 (Pat.)
Superintending powers of High Court
: Power under Art. 227 of Constitution not available to
this Court when impugned order already challenged by petitioner
before this Court as well as before Apex Court unsuccessfully.
III (2005) CCR
443 (Ker.)
Supervisory Jurisdiction : Writ Jurisdiction
: Confined only to see whether inferior Court or Tribunal
proceeded within parameters and not to correct error apparent
on face of record.
III (2005) CCR
298 (Del.)
Undertrials : Policy of Central Government
concerning terminally ill undertrials, i.e. foreign nationals
: Affidavit filed is relevant.
III (2005) CCR
372 (Del.) (DB)
"Warrant Case" : Meaning : Offence
punishable with imprisonment for term exceeding two years
: Case to be treated as warrant case.
III (2005) CCR 250 (J&K)
Abetment of Suicide : Cruelty : Dying
declaration : Suicide by bride by sprinkling kerosene
oil on herself, and setting herself on fire : 90% burns
sustained : Doctor clearly certified as to mental condition
of patient to make statement on docket : Deceased died
two hours after making statement : Where language of dying
declaration was of scribe but substance was of deceased,
no infirmity can be attached to dying declaration on this
count : Mere fact that dying declaration does not bear
signature or thumb impression or no certificate of doctor
that declarant is not in fit condition to make statement,
does not provide ground to reject dying declaration.
III (2005) CCR
83 (A.P.)
Abetment of Suicide : Cruelty : Parties
belonged to different castes : P.W. 6 was unwilling party
to have marriage celebrated : On the contrary, burden
is thrown and shifted to accused : This stand of prosecution
cannot be believed : Version of prosecution highly doubtful
: Ingredients of Section 306, I.P.C. not established :
No relationship of wife and husband between A1 and deceased
: Ingredients of Section 498-A, I.P.C. not established
: Prosecution miserably failed to bring home guilt of
accused : A1 and A2 entitled to acquittal.
III (2005) CCR
187 (Guj.)
Abetment of Suicide : Entering upon
Defence : Cruelty, Dowry Demand : Defence of petitioner
right from beginning that deceased committed suicide on
account of her previous love affair, even prior to her
marriage with accused No. 1 : Accused-petitioners made
request for preferring application to examine certain
witnesses : Request made by petitioners to issue summons
to witnesses neither vexatious nor device to delay trial
for defeating ends of justice : In absence of such circumstances,
want of strict adherence to Section 233(3), Cr.P.C. by
trial Judge resulted into manifest illegalities which
can only be cured in revisional jurisdiction.
III (2005) CCR
70 (Bom.)
Abetment of Suicide : Mens rea : FIR
discloses accused did not leave courtyard immediately
after threatening and they were for about 10-15 minutes
waiting for complainant to come out and do some overt
act itself : Mens rea to commit offence not totally absent.
III (2005) CCR
230 (Ker.)
Adulteration : Adulteration in Chilli
Powder : Defences available to vendor : Vendor shall not
be deemed to have committed offence pertaining to sale
of any adulterated or misbrand article if he proves he
purchased article from duly licensed manufacturer.
III (2005) CCR
152 (Bom.)
Adulteration : Adulteration in ground-nut
oil : Signature of accused No. 2 on postal acknowledgement
as well as on Vakalatnama compared by Magistrate and he
found those signatures do not tally with each other :
There was no strict compliance of Section 13 of Act :
Great prejudice caused to accused because his other part
of sample to be forwarded to CFL lost : Magistrate justified
in recording finding of acquittal against both accused
: No interference in same warranted.
III (2005) CCR
1 (Del.)
Alteration/Review of Judgment : Restriction
imposed on power of Court : No Court, when it has signed
its judgment or order finally disposing of case shall
alter or review same except to correct clerical or arithmetical
error : Said restitution to be understood in light of
Antulay's judgment : Mere procedural restriction cannot
annul power and duty of Court to prevent miscarriage of
justice.
III (2005) CCR
181 (Raj.)
Anticipatory Bail : Cancellation, Summons
to Produce Document or other Thing : Words "the person"
used in Section 91 does not include accused and accused
persons cannot be compelled to incriminate himself and
cannot be asked to disclose or produce any document.
III (2005) CCR
198 (Del.)
Anticipatory Bail : No allegation that
there were statements contained in evidence recorded in
case of co-accused which are against accused : Once co-accused
has been acquitted and roles ascribed to petitioner and
co-accused admittedly same, case for grant of anticipatory
bail made out.
III (2005) CCR
86 (M.P.)
Attempt to Murder : Right of Private
Defence : Appellant proved his case of right of self-
defence of his body and body of M by preponderance of
probabilities : Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond
reasonable doubt : Conviction and sentence of appellant
B set aside.
III (2005) CCR
229 (Del.)
Bail : Dispute over right to cultivate
land : Cross cases between petitioner and complainant
party : Petitioners included two ladies : All of them
received injuries at hands of complainant party : Some
of petitioners are young bright students and in custody
since 8.5.2005 : They are directed to be released on bail
with conditions.
III (2005) CCR
229 (Del.)
Bail : Practice and Procedure : Growing
tendency amongst Sessions Judges of not giving any reasons
while rejecting or granting bail : This is not healthy
practice : Observations made by Supreme Court in this
regard in Mansab Ali's case : Court expected to be mindful
of these observations while passing orders on bail applications.
III (2005) CCR
1 (Del.)
Bofors Contract : Cheating, Corruption,
Bribery : Quashing of Charges : Kapoor, J. directed Magistrate
to frame charge under Section 120B read with Section 420,
IPC against Hinduja Brothers : Magistrate also framed
substantive charge under Section 420, IPC against Hinduja
Brothers : Requirements of Sections 76 and 78(6), Evidence
Act, not fulfilled : Disputed photo copies do not qualify
as certified copies for various reasons : No evidence
to connect payments with Bofors contract or Hindujas were
Indian agents, employed for this Contract : Status of
Hindujas was of consultants and not of agents : Renumeration
payable to Hindujas was for market expenses incurred by
them and has nothing to do with securing of Bofors contract.
III (2005) CCR
1 (Del.)
Bofors Contract : Cheating, Corruption,
Bribery : Quashing of Charges : Documents received from
Department of Justice : Private documents/public documents
: They can be proved only under Section 78(6), Evidence
Act : No authentication existing in respect of these documents
and these documents can never be proved : C.B.I. failed
to produce original documents : No case can be proceeded
with in respect of Hinduja Brothers or Bofors Company
: All proceedings quashed against Hinduja Brothers and
they are discharged from case.
III (2005) CCR
201 (Ker.)
Cognizance of Offence : Investigation
on Complaint : On receipt of final report under Section
173(2) from police referred under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C.
for investigation on complaint, finding no offence made
out, Magistrate has power on receipt of fresh complaint
to club it along with final report of police and take
cognizance of case under Section 202 and issue process
under Section 204, Cr.P.C. : Second complaint can be entertained
in exceptional circumstances : Even if Magistrate has
accepted report, it will not prohibit Magistrate from
taking cognizance of offence on complaint filed and satisfied
on materials produced that cognizance of offence has to
be taken : Challenge raised in revision petition can only
be rejected.
III (2005) CCR
168 (Ker.)
Compounding of Offence : Wrongful restraint,
Criminal intimidation : Offence under Section 341, IPC
compoundable but under Section 506(ii), IPC non-compoundable
: Parties settled matter among themselves : They are all
Advocates from same Bar : No useful purpose will be served
by keeping complaint on file of Court below : Complaint
quashed.
III (2005) CCR
218 (Ker.) (DB)
Conviction or commitment on evidence
partly recorded by one Magistrate and partly by another
: Upon evidence recorded by predecessor Magistrate, successor
Magistrate manning Court empowered to proceed from next
stage of case and dispose of same.
III (2005) CCR
164 (All.) (DB)
Criminal Breach of Trust : Mischief
by Fire, Disappearance of Evidence : Fluid state of evidence
adduced by prosecution : No charge could be found substantiated
against accused persons on conjectural approach : Appellants
were exonerated in departmental proceedings : Mental distinction
between 'may be' and 'must be' is long and divides vague
conjectures from sure conclusions : Accusations against
accused persons could not travel from range of suspicion
to realm of certainty.
III (2005) CCR
279 (Cal.)
Criminal Breach of Trust : Quashing
of Criminal Complaint : Criminal Conspiracy : Maintenance
: Wife of complainant/respondent got married and did not
require maintenance further : She wanted to obtain modified
Court order to enable Reserve Bank to stop deduction of
Rs. 3,000/- p.m. from salary of complainant : There is
no order by High Court to Reserve Bank directing to stop
payment : Reserve Bank was never party to whole dispute
: Two accused persons, officers of Reserve Bank acting
under order of High Court, could not be said to have committed
offence under Section 406, IPC : They were caught in without
there being any role on their part : These officers have
nothing to do with marital discord between complainant
and his wife : They have also nothing to do with liability
of complainant to pay maintenance to his wife.
III (2005) CCR
183 (Del.)
Criminal Conspiracy : Quashing of Order
: Discharge : Cheating, Impersonation : No circumstantial
or direct evidence showing meeting of minds between petitioner
and Tak or between petitioner and two co-accused for commission
of their offence : Meeting of mind if any is shown to
have been for purpose of travelling together and nothing
more.
III (2005) CCR
257 (Raj.)
Cruelty, Dowry Death : Neither parents-in-law
nor Jeth, sister-in-law and brother-in-law of deceased
ever lived with her and her husband : Revisional Court
concluded prima facie no offence under Section 498-A,
I.P.C. made out against persons against whom police after
investigation did not submit charge-sheet making out case
either for offence under Section 498-A, I.P.C. or any
section of I.P.C. : No evidence available on record to
effect that soon before death of deceased she was subjected
to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative
of her husband for or in connection with dowry demand
: Impugned order calls for no interference.
III (2005) CCR
1 (SC)
Dishonour of Cheque: Challenge against
conviction and sentence : Joint petition of compromise
filed by parties stating settlement of dispute and grievances
: This Court permits parties to compound offence : Conviction
and sentence of appellant set aside in view of compromise
and he is acquitted of charge.
III (2005) CCR
209 (P&H)
Dishonour of Cheque : Computation of
Period of Limitation: Day from which such period to be
reckoned shall be excluded : Similar provision made in
Section 12(2), Limitation Act : Same principle incorporated
in Section 9 of General Clauses Act.
III (2005) CCR
157 (Mad.)
Dishonour of Cheque : Notice contemplated
under Section 138(b) to be given to accused by complainant
is one given after dishonour of cheque and not before
that : Notice issued earlier was before dishonour of cheques
: Complaint lodged after second notice maintainable as
per provisions of N.I. Act.
III (2005) CCR
167 (P&H)
Dishonour of Cheque : Quashing of second
complaint : Clubbing of complaints : Complainant and accused
common in two cases : Both criminal complaint filed by
respondent directed to be clubbed and entrusted to one
Court of Judicial Magistrate.
III (2005) CCR
81 (Del.)
Dishonour of Cheque : Territorial Jurisdiction
: Scope of provisions of Sections 177, 178, Cr.P.C. :
Accused persons who had issued cheques in favour of complainants
reside at New Delhi area : Complainant and even cheques
dishonoured in jurisdiction of New Delhi and only New
Delhi Courts have jurisdiction to entertain such complaints
and not Karkardooma Courts : Merely posting letter from
Krishna Nagar, which falls in jurisdiction of Karkardooma
Courts, could not give right to petitioner to file criminal
case in that area.